The Movie Fight Club Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Fight Club - Movie Review ExampleAlthough one put forward argue that the fibber makes more use of his mental capacity as evidenced by his imagining Tyler to the blame that he thinks Durden is a real soul, in the Narrators mind it is still the use of the dead body thru fighting and having sex which is dominant. Furthermore, this also serves as proof to the disorganized thoughts of the person.An important matter that faces us right off is how to make sense of the narrators creation of Tyler. Was he trying to project himself as a hitman? Deep inside, was he really a person fond of out-of-the-norm sexual practices? These are questions that essential be addressed because these characteristics are for an Eros person and not for Thanatos.For sure, the Narrator made Tyler as a genius who gave meaning to the life of other persons. We argue that this is not the case. Tyler is a separate entity and not the narrator himself. It is not the Narrator consciously projecting himself as t he hero. What the Narrator is actually committing was an act of transference where he transfers his reason or consciousness to Tyler. Due to his desperation because of the flaws in his character, he tries to commit another person his consciousness and make that individual make the world know of his angst. Since Tyler was only a product of the subconscious mind and is therefore unreal and since the dominant behavior of the person is as the Narrator in real, conscious life, we can, therefore, produce it was Tyler who was an Eros while the Narrator was a Thanatos.... Was he trying to project himself as a hero Deep inside, was he actually a person fond of out-of-the-norm sexual practices These are questions that must be addressed because these characteristics are for an Eros person and not for Thanatos.For sure, the Narrator made Tyler as a hero who gave meaning to the life of other persons. But the question is, was Tyler essentially the Narrator We argue that this is not the case. T yler is a separate entity and not the narrator himself. It is not the Narrator consciously projecting himself as the hero. What the Narrator is actually committing was an act of transference where he transfers his reason or consciousness to Tyler. Due to his desperation because of the flaws in his character, he tries to endow another person his consciousness and make that individual make the world know of his angst. Since Tyler was only a product of the subconscious and is therefore unreal and since the dominant behavior of the person is as the Narrator in real, conscious life, we can therefore say it was Tyler who was an Eros while the Narrator was a Thanatos.Having an Eros mind leads to many worries and frustrations while having a Thanatos character results to a life devoid of meaning. Being a rebellion can be fulfilling but only for a short time. In the end it leads to sadness and what-could-have-been statements. What then could lead to a happy lifeThere many ways in which mas s can be happy. Some achieve it by adding zeroes to their bank account while some bet the lack of conflict in interpersonal - especially marital- relationships as a happy life. Whatever have it may assume, happiness can be achieved if a person is successful in his endeavor - whether